Standardizing store-testing research practices

Partnered with a leading coffeehouse chain to design a toolkit empowering test teams, regardless of experience, to gather consistent data and uncover actionable insights.
Human-Centered Research
Design Toolkit
Visual Design
Workshop Facilitation

Client

Leading Beverage Brand

Duration

14 weeks

My Responsibilities

Secondary and Primary Research, Prototyping, Innovation Strategy, Facilitation, Built prototypes & assets

My Impact

Designed and published a HCD research toolkit to empower store-testing teams, has been implemented into 15 store tests and used by 14 researchers.

My Role

Researcher, Innovation Strategist, Project Manager

Case Study PDF

LCC Case Study
To protect the privacy of participants, all images in this project were created using AI tool MidJourney.

Background

The testing unit sought to upgrade their research methods for validating and scaling R&D breakthroughs faster.

In order to determine which innovations will stick, extensive and intensive field research was required.

Client's Team

We partnered with a beverage giant's R&D team to tackle service scaling, test emerging food tech, and train store staff nationwide in field research protocols.

Our Team

Our team of Institute of Design students conducted research, benchmarked industry innovation, and crafted strategy in lockstep with the client.

Our innovation team met regularly with the client's store testing unit.
Building better research starts with learning the right tools and knowing when to use them.

Store staff need clear protocols and training in research methods to effectively validate innovations in the field.

Store staff must grasp when and how to deploy research tools for optimal field results.

Research staff need to master design research methods, tools, and frameworks.

Staff lacked structured research processes, leading to inconsistent data analysis and knowledge gaps.

Lack of a common research strategy

Despite diverse talents, staff struggled with inconsistent research methods and unclear protocols.

Mixed skill levels led to inconsistent research.

Scattered workforce and varied experience made research methods unreliable.

The absence of research guidelines further limited effective use of available tools and frameworks.

Our team observed varying skills, levels of expertise, and varied approaches among trained, untrained and novice research staff.
Goal of the in-store testing unit
Our goal was to level up research with innovation, easy training, and fresh insights for everyone.

The testing unit aimed to become a learning hub for elevating research and innovation standards.

We aimed to enhance research practices and streamline training to deliver better insights across all skill levels.

With mastery of research tools, all staff can conduct field studies confidently.

A unified framework was needed to strengthen peer learning and improve data quality.

Solution

Research Select, our streamlined toolkit, bridges research gaps by enhancing field learning and insights.

Our toolkit empowers untrained research staff with structured frameworks for effective research and better insights.

We partnered with the client to create Research Select, aligning research tools with objectives through frameworks.

I crafted Research Select's visual design in Figma, with frameworks shaped by qualitative and online research.

Framework Examples

Impact

Our Research Select toolkit fuels innovation, enhances methodologies, and fosters collaboration.

Weekly leadership sessions now refine our toolkit based on nationwide store feedback, making it central to testing operations.

The toolkit drives research innovation through continuous peer learning.

Research shifted from roundtables to focused design groups, sharpening qualitative insights.

The testing unit builds on this success by refining focus group methods, deepening research excellence.

“[The] toolkit transformed testing into a strategic, data-driven process, empowering over 15 partners and shaping 20 tests and counting. More than just a set of tools, it sparked a cultural shift—teams now ask critical ‘why’ questions, identify gaps, and adopt more effective research methods.”

Sarah R.
Director of Store-Testing Operations

Process

Weeks 1-5

Interviews

Research with staff and industry leaders revealed a gap: untrained teams lack human-centered design skills, limiting customer insights.

Primary Research
Context Building
Understanding Workflow
Understanding Users

Weeks 10-11

Presentation & Facilitation

I worked collaboratively with the client, prototyping and incorporating feedback in real time.

Through prototype testing and facilitation at headquarters, we gathered feedback and secured buy-in from the Store Testing Unit.

Presentation to Stakeholders
Stakeholder Buy-in
Facilitating Toolkit Use

Roadmap

Our toolkit evolves through continuous field use and feedback, creating a self-improving research system.

Continuous field feedback refines both tools and user experience.

I built 18 guided frameworks, 5 method overviews, real-world examples, and choice-making tools to streamline research.

The toolkit grows smarter through researcher feedback, continuously improving to serve both novice and expert users.

We mapped the organization's innovation ecosystem to identify opportunities for growth.

We analyzed internal workflows and external partnerships to map key innovation factors.

We dissected the client's organizational structure to pinpoint crucial innovation drivers.

Our foundational analysis sparked targeted innovation hypotheses.

Defining a roadmap for our client's research education

We created a plan for achieving comprehensive and time-relevant HCD research education.

Now

Goal:

Ensure consistent human-centered design research for all staff.

  • Tactile
  • Immediate Use
  • Accessible
  • Collaborative

Solution:

Research Select Toolkit

1-3 yrs

Goal:

Strengthening the present staff capabilities for research excellence.

  • Expanding HCD learnings to all non-trained employees.
  • Expand the number of testing stores with increased capability

Solution:

Platform development and launch

3-5 yrs

Goal:

Expand & enhance staff education & capability for research, launch strategic IT processes & gather data for future AI-driven tools.

  • Iterating processes & workflows
  • Data collection for AI tools

Solution:

Improve platform utility with AI tools

5+ yrs

Goal:

Inclusive Innovation: Launching AI Tools for Global Impact.

  • Scale impact using AI
  • Build a global learning culture

Solution:

Build platform as an AI engine to stay time, culture and tech relevant to research practices for global impact